[gephex-devel] Information about ffmpeg compile problems on windows

[Philipp Promesberger [c]]

georg at kexbox.org wrote:

> Quoting "Philipp Promesberger [c]" <coma at gephex.org>:
>
>> georg at kexbox.org wrote:
>>
>>> Quoting "Philipp Promesberger [c]" <coma at gephex.org>:
>>>
>>>> I'm not sure on how to proceed with this...I suspect those weird 
>>>> linker warnings are the reason for this, so I'll try to find out 
>>>> what's happening there for now...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Before you invest (waste?) too much time with this (I already did ;),
>>
>>
>> No...if i understood this post correctly this is not concerning the 
>> version I'm playing around with ATM. The patch only fixes some 
>> compile errors of a different version. I'll try this if i can't get 
>> the newest version to work somehow.
>
Ok, I didn't see the follow up. This patch is not working though, those 
lines are different in the Makefile. Also, it seems he's talking about 
the "multiple defined symbols"...I don't get those.

-coma


--
------------------------ [ SECURITY NOTICE ] ------------------------
To: gephex-devel at lists.gephex.org.
For your security, coma at gephex.org
digitally signed this message on 27 June 2005 at 15:00:29 UTC.
Verify this digital signature at http://www.ciphire.com/verify.
------------------- [ CIPHIRE DIGITAL SIGNATURE ] -------------------
Q2lwaGlyZSBTaWcuAVdnZXBoZXgtZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZ2VwaGV4Lm9yZwBjb21hQGdlc
GhleC5vcmcAZW1haWwgYm9keQDnAgAAfAB8AAAAAQAAAI0UwELnAgAACQMAAgACAAIAIB
+oZ0QQT9njneW0BJbMBFNhWVl5dPLKbVD4NhL1uvURAQCAY+pi9xDkKQY80xF9IH5q1/2
gCQ+37YHuT7nVIQT0MXWi4HYHFR9y+/TWBB8UWzKMvhY2EsKE8U7zTX+UAqZEVcyCU2ln
RW5k
--------------------- [ END DIGITAL SIGNATURE ] ---------------------