[gephex-devel] opengl and gephex

[Manuel Massing]

Hi Martin,

> That depends on the linker and is out of the c spec. But you could
> define macros instead if functions. Or if the code is c++ you could
> create a compatibility header with something like that:
>
> namespace gl_compat
> {
> void glWhatever(GLint foobar)
> {
>      glcore::core->glWhatever(foobar);
> }
> }
> using gl_compat::glWhatever;

good idea, that looks like a viable option. as long as i can get
a script to do all the handwork :-)

> There are some detailed mails from Georg around that sum up important
> design discussions. I consider most of them quite official. :)

thanks for the tip. for future reference, i've added some archive links which 
seemed relevant. probably have missed a bunch, though.

keywords: gephex-0.5 design / gephex-0.5 architecture

http://lists.gephex.org/pipermail/gephex-devel/2004-January/000010.html
http://lists.gephex.org/pipermail/gephex-devel/2004-February/000040.html
http://lists.gephex.org/pipermail/gephex-devel/2004-May/000070.html
http://lists.gephex.org/pipermail/gephex-devel/2004-August/000108.html
http://lists.gephex.org/pipermail/gephex-devel/2004-November/000216.html
http://lists.gephex.org/pipermail/gephex-devel/2004-November/000235.html
http://lists.gephex.org/pipermail/gephex-devel/2004-November/000247.html
http://lists.gephex.org/pipermail/gephex-devel/2005-February/000415.html
http://lists.gephex.org/pipermail/gephex-devel/2005-March/000505.html
http://lists.gephex.org/pipermail/gephex-devel/2005-April/000611.html

bye,
	Manuel